Evaluating Biosurveillance System Components using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
نویسندگان
چکیده
Introduction The evaluation of biosurveillance system components is a complex, multi-objective decision that requires consideration of a variety of factors. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis provides a methodology to assist in the objective analysis of these types of evaluation by creating a mathematical model that can simulate decisions. This model can utilize many types of data, both quantitative and qualitative, that can accurately describe components. The decision-maker can use this model to determine which of the system components best accomplish the goals being evaluated. Before MCDA can be utilized effectively, an evaluation framework needs to be developed. We built a robust framework that identified unique metrics, surveillance goals, and priorities for metrics. Using this framework, we were able to use MCDA to assist in the evaluation of data streams and to determine which types would be of most use within a global biosurveillance system.
منابع مشابه
Selecting Essential Information for Biosurveillance—A Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
The National Strategy for Biosurveillance defines biosurveillance as "the process of gathering, integrating, interpreting, and communicating essential information related to all-hazards threats or disease activity affecting human, animal, or plant health to achieve early detection and warning, contribute to overall situational awareness of the health aspects of an incident, and to enable better...
متن کاملUsing Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods for Evaluation the Entrepreneurship and Innovation Indicators
This paper offered a procedure for ranking the entrepreneurial and innovative indicators using Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM), taking into account three individual,organizational and cultural dimensions simultaneously in decision making procedure. Henceforward, by using the Meta synthesis framework, the form of group classification of indicators from afinding’s combination was suggested ...
متن کاملVulnerability Analysis of Flood in Rangelands Using Multi Criteria Decision Analysis and Geographic Information System (Case Study: Gilard Basin, Damavand, Iran(
Flood disaster is considered as a major natural hazard due to its devastatingeffects on the affected areas. Determining the flood vulnerable areas is important fordecision makers in order to perform planning and management activities. GeographicalInformation System (GIS) is integrated with Multi Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA)used to analyze the flood vulnerable areas. The aim of this researc...
متن کاملUsing Multi-Criteria Spatial Decision Support System (MC-SDSS) in prioritization of Brownfield redevelopment in Mashhad metropolis
Aims & Backgrounds: The concept of redevelopment is accompanied by measures and forecasts to improve the quality of the physical environment of cities. This is necessary happened when the cohesion, coordination and performance of the urban environment is diminished and does not meet the needs of the environment. Brownfields are, including abandoned areas, inefficient and in need of redevelopmen...
متن کاملFuturology of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Techniques Using Philosophical Assumptions of Paradigms in Scenario Writing
There are many opportunities and threats in the decision-making environment for managers, and an organization must use research and information systems to change, monitor, and anticipate this environment. Futurism reflects how tomorrow reality gives birth to tomorrow's reality is. The purpose of this research; Analyzing the role of futures studies in the existing patterns of critical factors of...
متن کامل